Martijn Faassen wrote:
>>> I'd be in favor of an API based off calling the interface directly for
>>> everything *if* we can come up with a backwards compatibility story somehow.
>> Just as a data point, I forgot to hook "adapter_hook" in BFG (and I still
>> haven't), which means that the IFoo() sugar doesn't work. Nobody noticed,
>> though lots of folks who use BFG also use the ZCA global API.
>> I'm not implying that this means it's not useful or convenient for old
>> But the old hands don't really need it.
> Interesting. If you mostly do multi-adaptation (and utility lookups) you
> won't notice it as we know multi adaptation cannot be done with the
> adapter hook. Was this the case?
It's hard to know. No application written using BFG can use the IFoo() pattern
at all, and no one complained. The only generalization I can take away from
that is that anyone who has written a BFG app and also used the ZCA APIs did
not care about the IFoo() pattern. That's maybe not a really useful
generalization, because many BFG apps don't use the ZCA APIs at all.
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -