Fred Drake wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Martin Aspeli <optilude+li...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> I think >> that logically, these are two different concepts that meet two different >> sets of use cases. > > Agreed here. This is essential to this discussion. > > I've been quite surprised that there are so many who argue to unify these > ideas. > > > -Fred >
Agreed here as well. I think that the different intentions of 1) lookup by interface in registry and 2) adaptation will be easier to understand if the code patterns are different as well. Because I doubt tuple adaptation is that frequent, I am for > 5) Call the interface for adaption, and something else for utility > lookup, with tuples for multi-adaptation. where the something else is 'Interface.getUtility()'. This way we can - make the interface more prominent when doing lookups (and have some sort of symmetry between lookup and adaptation) - and simultaneously keep the semantic difference between adaptation and lookup. -- Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
