Thanks for doing this summary!

Gary Poster wrote:


> == Utilities available from interfaces ==
> As far as I can tell, no one is against this generally, and several
> people are for it.  Some people are against the syntax that has been
> proposed for this that merges utilties and adapters (see "No
> consensus" section below).  An alternate syntax was proposed
> involving a ``utility`` callable.  This made the most sense when it
> was paired with an ``adapters``  (or ``factory`` or ``new`` or
> ``instance`` or ``create``) callable, which contradicts the consensus
> of the "tuple multi-adaptation" section above.

It's clear that a unification of adaptation and utility lookup in the 
API as I discussed is going much too far for many people. So I've given 
up on that. (we can always take it up again in some other context in the 



Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to