One more question is how to solve the PIA problem with the automatic
registration of the component based registry?
This "import me, then you'll have it" bite us regularly.
I think this is definitely bad design.

Monday, January 11, 2010, 4:31:57 PM, you wrote:

R> Hi Hanno 

>> -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Hanno Schlichting [mailto:ha...@hannosch.eu] 
>> Gesendet: Montag, 11. Januar 2010 15:45
>> An: d...@projekt01.ch
>> Cc: zope-dev
>> Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] vocabularies missing wihtout zope.app.schema
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Roger <d...@projekt01.ch> wrote:
>> > Which concept should the ZTK use? The plain vocabulary from 
>> > zope.schema.vocabulary or the enhanced component 
>> lookupbased concept 
>> > defined in zope.app.schema.vocabulary?
>> Any idea how zope.componentvocabulary fits into this?

R> The zope.componentvocabulary package defines some
R> basic vocabulary (factory) classes. Probably we
R> should move the zope/app/schema/vocabulary.py
R> to this package as registry.py.

R> The question is, does someone like to use a non component
R> based vocabulary registry? Was that the reason that the 
R> vocabulary registry was not moved from zope.app.schema?
R> I guess not, right?

R> Regards
R> Roger Ineichen

>> Hanno

R> _______________________________________________
R> Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
R> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
R> **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
R> (Related lists - 
R>  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
R>  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Best regards,
 Adam GROSZER                            mailto:agros...@gmail.com
Quote of the day:
Learn to say no. It will be of more use to you than to be able to read Latin. 
- Charles Haddon Spurgeon 

Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to