On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Fabio Tranchitella <kob...@kobold.it> wrote:
> * 2010-03-03 19:59, Chris McDonough wrote:
>> I think it would be useful to have a discussion about grouping some Zope
>> bits along functional lines for marketing purposes.  This is really
>> independent of any discussion about the ZTK.
> I wonder if calling zope.{interface,component,schema,configuration,event}
> the "bicycle repair kit" (note the absence of the word "zope"), with
> explicit documentation and a dedicated website really need the approval of
> the whole zope3 community.
> Or, better... I don't think anybody can block John Doe to pick up a random
> set of packages, give them a name and market them as a framework (or as a
> reusable set of libraries) as long as the name "zope" is not used.
> Am I wrong? It's free software, after all.

This thread is primarily for meta (aka flame) discussions. If you're
going to discuss something technical, please start a separate thread.


Jim Fulton
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to