Stephan Richter wrote: > On Thursday 08 April 2010, Martin Aspeli wrote: >> Yes, I did look at it. However, the real goal is to provide isolation >> for "anything" that makes ZCA registrations. In particular, that >> includes provideAdapter() and friends. I suspect z3c.baseregistry can't >> deal with this? > > I think it can be done, just not in the way I intended it to. Instead of > adding the base registry to bases, you have to make it the actual registry for > the API, which should be no problem from a functional test setup function.
Can you elaborate on what you mean here? Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )