Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Thursday 08 April 2010, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Yes, I did look at it. However, the real goal is to provide isolation
>> for "anything" that makes ZCA registrations. In particular, that
>> includes provideAdapter() and friends. I suspect z3c.baseregistry can't
>> deal with this?
> I think it can be done, just not in the way I intended it to. Instead of
> adding the base registry to bases, you have to make it the actual registry for
> the API, which should be no problem from a functional test setup function.

Can you elaborate on what you mean here?


Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See

Zope-Dev maillist  -
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to