On 04/20/2010 10:05 PM, Fred Drake wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Christian Theune<c...@gocept.com> wrote:I don't know (or at least can't remember) all of the history of the discussion about that, but I wouldn't argue about following standard protocols.It *is* arguable that __name__ is a standard protocol. It's also not clear that our using it as we do is really the same thing. (And I don't think it's interesting to discuss whether we do the right thing or not.)I think the issue is with that it's not standard protocol the way we use it - at least I can't find our use of __bases__ documented in Python's documentation about __bases__ and thus have a hard time saying we're following standard protocols.Our uses of __bases__ and __parent__ don't match Python, and there's a general BDFL proclamation that underware are for Python implementations (IIRC). While we can argue that our use is reasonable, the fact that there's reasonable dissent suggests something different would have been a better choice.
I think the two of us agreeing, right? -- Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )