-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Lennart Regebro wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:24, Adam GROSZER <agros...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello Tres,
>> You think we have a chance to get rid of old cruft?
>> Like 5 years old nothing happened since then bugs.
>> I think we should add a tag "too old", add a note to warn subscribers,
>> then set a status "Won't fix" after a month.
> There is a state "not enough information" or something like that, and
> we can close bugs that has been in that state for a period of time.
> If the bug can be reproduced, it should not be closed just because
> it's old, even if it's 8 years old.
"Incomplete" is the auto-expiring state: if nobody responds in 30 days,
it automatically disappears.
I agree that we should at least attempt to reproduce even really old
bugs before assigning them 'wontfix' status (if we can't) or
'incomplete' (if we need more information).
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -