On 06/04/2010 12:49 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote: > On 6/3/10 8:20 AM, Christian Theune wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just fixed up z3c.ajax and it has a quirk that the check doesn't know >> about: >> >> If a file doesn't contain any copyright attribution header, it ignores >> that file. >> >> In this case, z3c.ajax has no headers at all. no setup.py. no buildout. >> >> I added the missing license and copyright files to silence the check but >> I'm relatively sure there's an edge case here. >> >> Thoughts? > > Any ideas yet on situations like these? > > I found several packages now that do not contain any copyright headers > in the python modules, or, sometimes they do in the package itself, but > not in the package's test modules. > > I decided to just go ahead for now silencing the check, my reasoning > being: if the copyright-checkscript is updated at some point in time to > also check for copyright-less modules, we automatically will have list > again of project that need fixing in that regard. > > OK?
That's what I think and did this morning, too. -- Christian Theune · [email protected] gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
