On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida <leoroch...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 19:22, Benji York <be...@benjiyork.com> wrote: >> [...] >> Not surprising really. > > What could be surprising is that, since the objects are not in the > object cache or the ZEO cache, how can the clients 'know' about them > to request them? > > And the answer is probably that there are other objects which ARE in > the object cache, or the ZEO cache and that hold references (ghost > objects in the case of the object-cache) to the objects in the > zeo-distributed temporary storage.
Indeed. My jet lag ate that part of the story. Thanks. > So, perhaps, Sebastian can avoid a Zope restart if he finds a way to > flush all caches. Flushing the object caches is easy, it's in the > Control_Panel. Flushing the ZEO cache is something else. Perhaps he > can run with a 0-sized ZEO cache for the TempStorages? If this were me, I'd use a non-temporary storage and implement an expiry policy for the results cache. The bforest package would be a good start (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.bforest). In fact, I would expect they already have an expiry policy in place, so they might be able to just start using a non-temporary storage right away. -- Benji York _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )