On 10/29/2010 08:26 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
> Am 27.10.2010 um 08:52 schrieb Christian Theune:
>> On 10/27/2010 08:44 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
>>> +1 But the `mapping` attribute should update the existing mapping of the
>>> message ID as this would allow to have a partial mapping stored on the
>>> message ID and add the other part when translating.
>> Does this use case really appear that often?
> I think of it as low hanging fruit.
You're probably right.
>> I see that there isn't much danger to doing that as the mappings
>> shouldn't be too large anyway and the code that processes them doesn't
>> allow for control structures based on their values so having superfluous
>> values wouldn't hurt and this behaviour would keep old code working.
>> OTOH can you make a feature request for this so I can deal with it
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope.i18n/+bug/668189 (Did not find out how to
> make a feature request, so filed it as bug.)
Make a bug and mark it wishlist. I've done that for your.
Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -