On 10/29/2010 08:26 AM, Michael Howitz wrote: > Am 27.10.2010 um 08:52 schrieb Christian Theune: >> On 10/27/2010 08:44 AM, Michael Howitz wrote: > [...] >>> +1 But the `mapping` attribute should update the existing mapping of the >>> message ID as this would allow to have a partial mapping stored on the >>> message ID and add the other part when translating. >> >> Does this use case really appear that often? > > I think of it as low hanging fruit.
You're probably right. >> I see that there isn't much danger to doing that as the mappings >> shouldn't be too large anyway and the code that processes them doesn't >> allow for control structures based on their values so having superfluous >> values wouldn't hurt and this behaviour would keep old code working. >> >> OTOH can you make a feature request for this so I can deal with it >> separately? > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope.i18n/+bug/668189 (Did not find out how to > make a feature request, so filed it as bug.) Make a bug and mark it wishlist. I've done that for your. Christian -- Christian Theune · [email protected] gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
