* Sebastien Douche <sdou...@gmail.com> [2011-03-28 13:26]:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 15:18, Wolfgang Schnerring <w...@gocept.com> wrote:
>> An honest counter question: Why not use zope.testrunner? What
>> advantages does py.test offer?
> On the technical side, I don't know. But from my point of view, the
> most important thing is the "social" side. I'm a bit tired to be
> "compartmentalized" : you must use "generics" tools (Nose, WebOb,
> Paster...) or Zope tools (Zope3, KGS, zope.testbrowser, zope.testing,
> zc.buildout, z3c.testsetup...).

I'd like to clarify that I've asked the question not to exclude py.test,
but on the opposite, to *include* it into consideration. So I think we're
actually in agreement with each other. :-)


Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to