Hello, * Sebastien Douche <sdou...@gmail.com> [2011-03-28 13:26]: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 15:18, Wolfgang Schnerring <w...@gocept.com> wrote: >> An honest counter question: Why not use zope.testrunner? What >> advantages does py.test offer? > > On the technical side, I don't know. But from my point of view, the > most important thing is the "social" side. I'm a bit tired to be > "compartmentalized" : you must use "generics" tools (Nose, WebOb, > Paster...) or Zope tools (Zope3, KGS, zope.testbrowser, zope.testing, > zc.buildout, z3c.testsetup...).
I'd like to clarify that I've asked the question not to exclude py.test, but on the opposite, to *include* it into consideration. So I think we're actually in agreement with each other. :-) Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
