Am 19.04.2011 um 15:29 schrieb Jim Fulton:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Jens Vagelpohl <j...@dataflake.org> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> On 4/19/11 15:19 , Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Jens Vagelpohl <j...@dataflake.org> wrote:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>> On 4/19/11 08:52 , Michael Howitz wrote:
>>>>> while making projects in SVN complying to the repository policy I found
>>>>> files which tell that their license is "Zope Visible Source License,
>>>>> Version 1.0 (ZVSL)".
>>>>> Is this license a valid license in the zope.org repository?
>>>>> If not I'd like to merge the following change in zope.repositorypolicy:
>>>> The ZVSL is a Zope Corporation-specific license that does not meet the
>>>> requirements for projects hosted by the Zope Foundation. I am surprised
>>>> you found any files with that license. Those should be in Zope
>>>> Corporation-owned repositories, or they should be relicensed if ZC agrees.
>>> Sorry our (probably my) bad. Those should have been fixed when we
>>> moved them from our repo to the zope.org repo.
>>> Does the patch fix the files? Or just list them?
>> Hi Jim,
>> It just lists them as part of the weekly repository policy check that
>> flows into the automated test summary email.
> OK. I normally don't read that mail. I'll check in a week or so and
> if I see the list,
> I'll clean them up.
I merged the branch to the trunk so, the next run of the of the weekly
repository policy check should show the affected packages.
Michael Howitz · m...@gocept.com · software developer
gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 8 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -