On 15 June 2011 19:05, Baiju M <baiju.m.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Baiju M <baiju.m.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Is memcached a reliable storage for session data ?
>>> I would like to hear others experience with memcached
>>> as a reliable storage for session data.
>> It depends on what kind of reliability you need. Generally your
>> sessions should be short-lived and memcached is fine for that.
> Well, what about a persistent session storage for 20 minutes
> in memcached ? Do we have any control over when the keys are
> evicted ?
> I am just reading few articles related to this:
If you don't supply the -M argument then memcached won't evict objects
before their expiration time, but it may run out of memory.
The new unlogged tables in Postgres 9.1 might be a great fit, though
you'll still wipe sessions when you make changes to your
infrastructure / restart stuff. But most sites can cope with that.
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -