On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu> wrote: > Ideally I'd like to get avoid storing such information in the ZODB at > all and would much prefer a volatile attribute, a thread local or > something on the filesystem. But maybe I'm missing something here were > this information needs to be shared across workers running on > different machines.
I do believe that's the case. Increasing the period is probably safe. Another strategy you can employ is to use a separate database for the zc.async bookkeeping; that could have different pack policies or a completely different storage implementation. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> "Give me the luxuries of life and I will willingly do without the necessities." --Frank Lloyd Wright _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
