On 25/08/2011 06:24, Jim Fulton wrote: > Maybe something like "zope.plugins" would be better. When I try > to explain zope.component to people, I often explain it as a good > generic plugin mechanism.
If we're renaming, we could also consider dropping the "zope" bit. I never will understand the irrational fear and hatred of the "zope" name but it's still there and I reckon we'd get a much more sensible reception in the rest of the python world if we dropped it. cheers, Chris PS: In passing, and for similar reasons, along with ease of pronunciation and lack of package namespacing, it'd be great if buildout 2.0 could be just "buildout" rather than zc.buildout. -- Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )