On 05/26/2012 10:45 AM, Gediminas Paulauskas wrote:
> 2012/5/26 Marius Gedminas <mar...@gedmin.as>:
>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:58:20PM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
>>> On 05/25/2012 09:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer wrote:
>>>>  FAILED Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux
>>> Ugh, the old eccentric FTP HELP failure
>>>> Failure in test testHELP
>>>> (zope.server.ftp.tests.test_ftpserver.Tests) Traceback (most
>>>> recent call last): File
>>>> "/usr/local/python2.4.6/lib/python2.4/unittest.py", line 260, in
>>>> run testMethod() File
line 280, in testHELP self.assertEqual(self.execute('HELP', 1),
>>>> result) File "/usr/local/python2.4.6/lib/python2.4/unittest.py",
>>>> line 333, in failUnlessEqual raise self.failureException, \
>>>> AssertionError: '214-The following commands are recognized\r\n'
>>>> != '214-The following commands are recognized\r\nHelp goes here
>>>> somewhen.\r\n214 Help done.\r\n'
>>> I have no idea why this would be failing *now*, as opposed to
>> It's nondeterministic.
>> I once posted a proposed patch:
>> I didn't commit it since I was completely unable to reproduce the
>> failure on my machine, and so couldn't verify that it was the
>> correct fix.
> I have committed this fix a year ago:
> and also merged to 3.6 branch. But there is no branch for Zope 3.4.
Thanks for the heads up: I went looking for how the KGS worked, and
found (I believe) that the KGS was managed via the 'zope.release'
package: it's buildout doesnt have a "devlopment checkouts" model
similar to the ZTK: it only tests released packages. I don't think it
is worthwhile to backport your fix to a new 3.4.4 release of zope.server;
instead, I recommend that we running the KGS tests at all (acknowledging
that nobody is doing active development on it).
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -