2012/7/3 Roger <d...@projekt01.ch>

> Hi Kirill
> Why not just implement your own package and use this
> enhanced IntIds utility from there in your project?

Do you think that anyone else does not need the fix that I did?

This error in the zope.intid completely negates the whole transparency
in working
with persistent objects. Due it is necessary to use various tricks, which
impairs the understanding of how the program works.
My patch does not break backwards compatibility and do not require
additional changes to the code of existing components. So why not merge it
into the "zope.intid", instead of create a "cykooz.intid"?
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to