-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 02/11/2013 03:36 PM, Stephan Richter wrote:
> Hi Tres (and everyone else reading along),
> as you are probably aware, zope.security is a package that blocks a
> lot of other packages from being ported. I just checked out the
> coverage on Github and it looks like you are making good progress.
> The biggest issue I see with zope.security is its dependency on
> RestrictedPython, because I think that will take a long time to port
> correctly. However, most of zope.security is very much usable and used
> without zope.security.untrustedpython.
> I propose to split zope.security.untrustedpython into a separate
> package called zope.untrustedpython, so that a port of zope.security
> to Python 3 can move forward. (Note: I am signing up for the work.)
+1 for splitting out the RP dependency.
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -