Followup to:
zope web status report 2006-02-06
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-web/2006-February/003676.html
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Do we really want to add to the confusion by throwing in old Zope 2
> documentation, that still refers to Zope 2.6 and has one gazillion very
> confusing in-line text comments?
Thats why i set the preliminary structure of the documentation section to::
Documentation
-------------
Base Zope documentation:
- What's new in {Zope2|3|CMF|Five} releases
- ZopeBook
- ZDG
- z3 static API docs
- Zope3Book
Extended Zope documentation:
- Article DB (tags/keywords)
- Best-of-zope.org (Historical Docs)
(see: http://codespeak.net/svn/z3/zopeweb/trunk/functionality.txt)
It is all about (re)using existing documentation and create an
'article-db' for the new ones.
Second, i'd ask you to contribute a listing of documents (content) that
should be included with the article-db (this is more productive than
complaining about 'ZopeBook cruft').
> Not sure if it's relevant, but the PloneHelpCenter that runs
> http://plone.org/documentation is of course open source. :)
This requires plone, which is no option atm.
Michael
// see all docs at http://codespeak.net/svn/z3/zopeweb/trunk/
--
http://zope.org/Members/d2m
http://planetzope.org
_______________________________________________
Zope-web maillist - Zope-web@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web
