On Thursday 14 April 2005 13:43, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:22:53PM -0400, Stephan Richter wrote:
> | On Thursday 14 April 2005 13:00, Florent Guillaume wrote:
> | > > +    def __init__(self, stream):
> | > > +        self.stream = stream
> | > > +        self.cacheStream = cStringIO.StringIO()
> | >
> | > Won't a memory cache be a problem for multi-megabytes POSTs ?
> |
> | Maybe, but we have no choice here. The only other option is to make it a
> | temporary file.
>
> Maybe!?! Please, give it some thought. It has caused lots of pain in
> Zope 2, which just recently got fixed. That means a 'temp hack' can
> live as much as 8 (?) years.

Any constructive input? Will a temporary file be better? Will it work easily 
cross-platform? How was this solved in Zope 2?

Also, since you are here, Sidnei, could you please, please fix WebDAV? 

Regards,
Stephan
-- 
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to