Martijn Faassen  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only non-standard part left in the release name if we drop the 
> double 3 is the X. The X is a bit of a bother and will get us into 
> trouble anyway eventually if a Zope 3 proper is ever released, as I 
> can't see how we'd avoid situations where we'd have to say: "Zope 3.1 is 
> actually Zope X3.4 + Zope 2 compatibility extensions 0.7", which sounds 
> less than ideal. I personally wouldn't mind if we just dropped the X.

Yes, IMHO it'd be simpler to rename Zope X3.4 to Zope 3.4, and when the
real Zope-3-with-Zope-2-compatibility arrives, either call it 3.6 or
whatever is the current numbering, if it makes sense to have it in the
same branch (which I understand may not be the case), or simply go to
Zope 4.


Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France)   CTO, Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zope3-dev mailing list

Reply via email to