On 7/26/05, sureshvv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Me thinks the error message is pretty broken! Or is that now considered a PT
> feature? ;)

I'll grant that it's less than ideal, but not broken by HTML
standards.  The <p> in the original source is closed by an implied
</p> where the <ul> starts, so while it's not broken as far as
compliance with the specification is concerned, it is confusing.

Adding logic to separate this case from a more obvious unbalanced tag
problem just doesn't seem a high priority to me, but I'll certainly
consider patches to the PT compiler to improve the situation.  That's
a pretty tricky bit of code, unfortunately.


Fred L. Drake, Jr.    <fdrake at gmail.com>
Zope Corporation
Zope3-dev mailing list
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to