-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Benji York wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
> 
>> I'd liek to hear why testbrowser requires Python 2.4.
> 
> 
> I haven't tried it on 2.3 yet, but the main thing is the use of
> decorator syntax.  Obviously that wouldn't be hard to back port, if a bit
> uglier.
> 
>> If we decide we want to continue supporting Python 2.3, then I'd want
>> to try to make testbrowser (and formlib) work with 2.3.  We haven't
>> decided that we need to support 2.3. We need to decide and we need to
>> take the Zope project as a whole into account.
> 
> 
> Personally I'd like 3.2 to require 2.4, but admit that most people (Zope
> 2 users especially) might prefer we not force that requirement on them.

I support 3.2 with 2.4 as well. Just for being able to play with new
Python stuffs :) And is it that complicated to have Zope2.9 working with
2.4 ? (because 3.2 will likely be shipped with 2.9 right ?)

        J.


- --
Julien Anguenot | Nuxeo R&D (Paris, France)
CPS Platform : http://www.cps-project.org
Zope3 / ECM   : http://www.z3lab.org
mail: anguenot at nuxeo.com; tel: +33 (0) 6 72 57 57 66
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFC650aGhoG8MxZ/pIRAm/bAJ9I5nQBIt68ymCWNKe0Z98w+SoEXgCfYzVl
pZtDVuZh6pQxiIdyi5mhg7g=
=ZTPy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to