I couldn't disagree more.
Moving Zope3 off of Zope.org is a big mistake. Zope 3 is part of Zope is
it not? Shouldn't it be on that website?
It just seems silly and short-sighted to try to break out one from the
other, when all Zopes (1/2/3......10/11/12) belong on that one website.
Wasn't that the point of moving CMF back from cmf.zope.org?
Why not spend the time and energy making Zope.org a better place than just
moving it off to yet another under-developed and utilized website?
Benji York said:
> Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> b) It is exactly the opposite of what we've been trying to do for the
>> last couple of months: convergence, not divergence!
> I think that differentiating Zope 3 from Zope 2 is a good thing.
>> If we want Zope 3 and its Component Architecture to be recognized by
>> people, it needs to be a first class citizen on zope.org, not some
>> separate site.
> Nothing says that zope3.org can't be prominently displayed on zope.org.
>> Why? Because Zope 2 will soon incorporate lots of Zope 3 technology
>> (it already does incorporate some),
> I would posit that there are *many* non-Zope 2 users, and that is a
> group we need to attract. Too closely associating Zope 2 and Zope 3
> will only inhibit that.
>> making it all look like two separate worlds is far from reality.
> I'm more interested in promoting Zope 3 than having web site structure
> reflect reality.
> Benji York
> Senior Software Engineer
> Zope Corporation
> Zope3-dev mailing list
> Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/jake%40zopezone.com
Zope3-dev mailing list