> Martijn Faassen wrote:
> > ...
> > Outside the Zope community Zope 3 doesn't have such a great image
> > indeed. It's either ignored, or it's actively rejected.
> There is a lot
> > of competition with other frameworks. Zope 3 is currently not doing
> > particularly well in this competition, something we need to
> fix, but
> > that's another topic for another thread. It doesn't change that
> > inviting in the Zope 2 developers is most effective thing
> we can do at
> > present to grow the Zope 3 community.
> > Regards,
> > Martijn
> It is a bit like this: the zope2 community wants the zope3 technology
> and zope3 wants the zope2 community.
> I think the question about the technology should be treated
> as such on a
> technical level, by bridging the technical gap (Five, common
> repositories, writing tutorials for zope2 developers,
> collaborating on
> common modules, adapting zope2 concepts like TTW editing to Zope3 but
> without reproducing the zope2 skin and templates mess, etc).
> But the question about the communities involves more complicated
> aspects, i.e. marketing issues, licenses, competition,
> strategies, etc.
> The repository is not the answer. This has to be solved on a higher
> level, Zope Foundation, updated ZPL license, ... where a
> social contract
> is agreed on.
> So let's not pretend that everything can be solved on a technological
> level even though lots of it can ..
+1 for that
> Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev mailing list