Christian Theune wrote: > I think this is two things: visibility and having more people look at > large projects like the twisted integration. I think Stephan did a great > Job (at least AFAIK he was the one doing the twisted integration, > right?) but I haven't found a single proposal about doing that > integration and I haven't found any documentation how the integration > works either.
Christian has an important point here: There was neither a proposal for the introduction of WSGI features, nor the zope.publisher refactoring nor the Twisted integration. The latter could have been that documentation Christian is missing (and so am I). I remember asking Stephan about such docs when the integration was being done (because I sometimes I just can't read the code) and I remember that writing docs was deferred out of the lack of time. The suggestion was that if I wanted docs, I should write them myself. This is not to discredit Stephan and Michael's great achievement in any way, just a reminder that we have certain standards when it comes to code. Those include the existence of tests, for example. I think they should also include the existence of docs, a proposal being a minimum for changes like these. > I do have a good feeling that the structures that will be provided by > the Zope Foundation will help us (not solve the problem on their own, > but be supportive). I don't think we neither need the ZF for this nor should we need it. I think it has been understood by everyone that the ZF shouldn't dictate development issues. We have technical popes for that :). Philipp _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3email@example.com Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com