Stephan Richter wrote:
I hope it would have sometimes a "?" in them, since this is a totally valid
character. also ":" will be in 90% of the URLs. The idea here is that we want
to support those silly apple URLs.
OK, I guess my point was that there's a perfectly good library function
that does this, and supports marking certain characters (suchs as ':')
as "safe" if you want them to be, so I'm curious as to why we're growing
our own warts?
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
Zope3-dev mailing list