On Friday 09 December 2005 06:09, Chris Withers wrote:
> OK, I guess my point was that there's a perfectly good library function
> that does this, and supports marking certain characters (suchs as ':')
> as "safe" if you want them to be, so I'm curious as to why we're growing
> our own warts?
Because we really just want to convert this one character; in this case it is
much easier to write your own function.
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Zope3-dev mailing list