On Friday 09 December 2005 06:09, Chris Withers wrote:
> OK, I guess my point was that there's a perfectly good library function
> that does this, and supports marking certain characters (suchs as ':')
> as "safe" if you want them to be, so I'm curious as to why we're growing
> our own warts?

Because we really just want to convert this one character; in this case it is 
much easier to write your own function.

Stephan Richter
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Zope3-dev mailing list
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to