its good for specific application deployments, as intimately tied to the appserver its bad, since it dictates deployment requirements to have a xul capable client, ie. non standard, defacto or otherwise.

-kapil

On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 07:26:30 -0800, Fabrice Monaco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

For the backend (manage) this isn't problem. i have just one suggestion
FireFox+xul+Zope is good ?

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Withers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: mardi 6 d├ęcembre 2005 16:07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: zope3-dev@zope.org; Fabrice Monaco
Subject: Re: [Zope3-dev] RE: Zope3-dev Digest, Vol 29, Issue 9


Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 06 December 2005 09:44, Fabrice Monaco wrote:

Why not XUL?

Because it sucks and is browser-specific.

Be careful, or you'll have Paul in tears ;-)

Chris

--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/hazmat%40objectrealms.net




--

_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to