On Dec 13, 2005, at 9:32 PM, Gary Poster wrote:

I sent this out too hastily.  See below.

The answer we expected to give to the improved implementation details hinged on the page postprocessing proposal Jim made.

It was not a proposal, but a brainstorm.



My impression is that Jim felt that this didn't "fly": there was not enough feedback for him to proceed. I may misunderstand.

I don't think we proceeded past "brainstorm" to "proposal".

In any case, it didn't happen. Anyone want to take up the ball in the conversation again? Personally, I wanted to just put exactly what Jim discussed into place and see where it led.

My position should perhaps be taken at least as a straw man.

I'd like to see something like this worked out. I suppose I should try to come up with some details, concerns, or solutions on the basis of Jim's document, and work them out here. How about some other people do that too? :-)

Zope3-dev mailing list
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to