Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 07:33:13AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
| >There are a couple conditions that must be met for 'chunked' to work
| >with Zope 2.
| >
| >1. A Content-Length header must not be set.
| >2. The request must be HTTP 1.1
| >3. You must be streaming
| >4. No 'Connection: close' header has been set during the request
| >
| >If all of that is met, then it works just fine. The signal for 'end of
| >data' in chunked mode is '0\r\n\r\n', which Zope properly inserts when
| >appropriate.
| | Is this documented anywhere?


In this email and on the source only it seems :( Could write a doctest
for sure.

That's what I thought. :)

That's good. It means we're not bound. ;)

| I'd really like us to think about how we *want* this to work in Zope (2 and | 3). | | I'm uncomfortable with the subtle cues that seem to change the behavior of
| request.write from non-streaming to streaming.  I'd like to see
| a proposal for a clean API that supports:
| | - Simple traditional output (ie pages) | | - Non-streaming large-file output. | | o Don't hold application thread to do I/O | | o Don't consume a lot of memory | | - Streaming output | | o For applications that tale a lot of time to generate
|     output.
| | o Output is generated over a long period of time. | | o Perhaps extends life of application thread. | | (Maybe there are other alternatives.)

If I understand correctly the newly introduced one would be the second
bullet? I don't have an idea of how that can be achieved.

What newly introduced one?  You mean the IResult business?
The IResult api addresses the first use case, not the second.

FWIW, I could live with returning a generator instead of using
request.write for all applications where I use request.write today.

Cool. But that alone doesn't really address the core issue of how the
application thread should be managed. (I need to think about this
some more.)

One thing that I had in mind for long-running streaming output is that
99% of the time it just needs a constant, read-only view of the
database at the time the streaming started so instead of using a
connection from the zodb connection pool, it could open a new,
read-only connection and use that for delivering the content.

I don't see how that helps. Avoiding writes doesn't substantially
(if at all) reduce resource consumption.

Jim
--
Jim Fulton           mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]       Python Powered!
CTO                  (540) 361-1714            http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation     http://www.zope.com       http://www.zope.org
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to