Andreas Jung wrote: > > > --On 29. Dezember 2005 10:08:03 -0330 Rocky Burt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Andreas Jung wrote: >> > Another argument against removing python expressions: in Zope 2 >> >>> scripters could directly modify and test templates, script etc. (also >>> using the skins tool). In Z3 you have to restart the server at least for >>> view classes (but not for templates). >> >> >> Personally I would say implement logic that allows view classes to be >> reloadable rather than relying on zpt for exactly this reason if this is >> indeed something developers need/want (I would love for such a feature). >> This was also one of the nice things about writing python scripts as a >> skins item with CMF as it was instantly reloadable. >> > > To bring it to the point: _scripters_ should be able to develop in Zope > 3 as easy as in Zope 2 :-) > > -aj > >
Or at least almost as easily as in RoR or Django. TTW is not a requirement; Chris McDonough's "TTB" posting was right on target (http://www.plope.com/Members/chrism/ttb_programming). There are 3 PHP developers in the group I work in, and they know they want something better, and they like Python. But when they look at Z3 they get all upset & confused. Is this (increased usability for non-experts) a possible project for the Zope sprint at Pycon? I'll be there. And since I am not an expert myself, I will have a head start. -- Wade Leftwich Ithaca, NY _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com