On Thursday 19 January 2006 07:00, Jim Fulton wrote:
> > I have seen you take a similar approach to zope.testing and I found that
> > painful just by watching the checkins.
> I don't understand what you mean. Having a separate zope.testing project
> has been extremely useful. For example, in our comercial apps,
> we often used newer versions than existed in Zope 3. We often needed
> enhacements to zope.testing at times that Zope 3 was feature frozen.
> We could have made a Zope 3 branch just to modify zope.testing, but that
> would have been a hassle for us and for Zope 3 developers. Note that
> the new test runner (from zope.testing) was used in ZODB long before it
> was used in Zope 3.
Argument taken and agreed that this is a valuable use case.
CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
Zope3-dev mailing list