On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:15:43 -0800, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1 from me, I see this as being a way to have another split in how things
are done, and that different products will use different syntax. Having
products be simple and consistent is important (and also part of the
reason why Plone didn't want to support both DTML and ZPT, FWIW).
I don't believe the problem is the XML itself; rather how ZCML tries to do
too much, and gets convoluted. I'm a supporter of the approach advocated
by Philipp, where cleaning up ZCML somewhat is the way to go.
Alexander Limi · Chief Architect · Plone Solutions · Norway
Consulting · Training · Development · http://www.plonesolutions.com
Plone Co-Founder · http://plone.org · Connecting Content
Plone Foundation · http://plone.org/foundation · Protecting Plone
Zope3-dev mailing list