On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:15:43 -0800, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


-1 from me, I see this as being a way to have another split in how things are done, and that different products will use different syntax. Having products be simple and consistent is important (and also part of the reason why Plone didn't want to support both DTML and ZPT, FWIW).

I don't believe the problem is the XML itself; rather how ZCML tries to do too much, and gets convoluted. I'm a supporter of the approach advocated by Philipp, where cleaning up ZCML somewhat is the way to go.


     Alexander Limi · Chief Architect · Plone Solutions · Norway

 Consulting · Training · Development · http://www.plonesolutions.com

      Plone Co-Founder · http://plone.org · Connecting Content
  Plone Foundation · http://plone.org/foundation · Protecting Plone

Zope3-dev mailing list
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to