Martijn Faassen wrote:
Max M wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Alternatively, we could use our energy to actually work together on
a new website instead of competing. There's a zope-web mailing list,
after all, so go and talk there. This would have my preference.
If you want to fix the Zope 2 website at the same time as branding
Zope 3, I fear it is a monumental task that will never happen.
Yes, that is indeed a risk that I'm well aware of. Still, I think we
can present a good 'brochure' about Zope 2 on a unified website.
Whatever we do, we should definitely sketch out the relationship
between the two projects, something that is now completely missing.
Zope 2 needs marketing as much as Zope 3.
The Zope 2 website is so big, and has so much content that it should
have somebody working on it full time if it needs changing. Perhaps
this "monumental" approach to a zope site is wrong. Microsites with
well defined boundaries, that a few or a single person could be
responsible for might be a better approach.
Yes. Rest assured my ambition is to keep ambitions as low as possible.
:) Otherwise nothing will happen.
The front page of Zope.org doesn't show the activity around Z3 at all.
That wouln't cost anything to start to add a few z3 links in Zope Exits
for example.
(beside the point to have a marco/micro approach)
Regards
Tarek
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
