Lennart Regebro wrote: > I think I agree. This to me makes sense. If it were nameless (are > there nameless utilities) you could then get off with just <utility > component=".alias.sydneyFactory" /> which is then the on/off switch we > mentioned earlier. And an adapter should be registered the same way > <adapter component=".alias.FidgetAdapter" /> and what it adapts > between should be a part of the python-code with an adapts(ISomething) > declaration, just like implements(ISomethingelse), which I think you > suggested in your "ZCML does doo much" blog, right?
Among other things, yes. The idea isn't mine though, it was Jim's and is already in-place as of Zope 3.2/2.9. Philipp _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
