On 2/15/06, Jeff Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would prefer not. We've used resourceDirectory to support things > like webcams. The image(s) uploaded by the cams might not always be > there, but the containing path is. It's nice not having Zope start
Good point. > If it was sugar for a set of resource directives, this could easily > fail out on us, unless it was making 'resource' items all the time > whenever the directory's contents changed. Right. In which case, another possibility would be to have a new directive that really is just sugar as I described. That would avoid backward compatibility problems and make the intention clear. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> "There is no wealth but life." --John Ruskin _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list [email protected] Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
