Jim Fulton wrote:
2) In an alternate vision, Zope 2 evolves to Zope 5.
Zope 2 is complicated! It has too many layers of everything.
The reason for Zope 3 is to make it simpler for developers.
Therefore I believe that any succesfull strategy would require Zope 3 to
be usable completely without all the Zope 2 layers.
If Zope 3 becomes just another layer on top of Zope 2 -> CMF -> Plone it
will not reduce complexity, as any developer would still need to learn
the entire stack.
Wherever practical, Zope 2 technologies should be rewritten to Zope 3
technologies to remove layers from the stack.
hilsen/regards Max M, Denmark
IT's Mad Science
Zope3-dev mailing list