Max M wrote: > Jim Fulton wrote: > >> 2) In an alternate vision, Zope 2 evolves to Zope 5. > > Zope 2 is complicated! It has too many layers of everything.
Layers are good, when they reliably hide complexity. > The reason for Zope 3 is to make it simpler for developers. Yep. 14'30'' wikis and such. > Therefore I believe that any succesfull strategy would require Zope 3 > to be usable completely without all the Zope 2 layers. > > If Zope 3 becomes just another layer on top of Zope 2 -> CMF -> Plone > it will not reduce complexity, as any developer would still need to > learn the entire stack. You mean, "on top" -> "below" ? (And "Plone" -> "CPS" ;) ). > Wherever practical, Zope 2 technologies should be rewritten to Zope 3 > technologies to remove layers from the stack. To make discussion concrete, is there a list of (core, not CMF) Zope 2 technologies that are currently missing from Zope 3 ? S. -- Stéfane Fermigier, Tel: +33 (0)6 63 04 12 77 (mobile). Nuxeo Collaborative Portal Server: http://www.nuxeo.com/cps Gestion de contenu web / portail collaboratif / groupware / open source! _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3email@example.com Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com