Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
Max M said the following on 2006-02-27 17:26:
Jim Fulton wrote:
2) In an alternate vision, Zope 2 evolves to Zope 5.
Zope 2 is complicated! It has too many layers of everything.
read the full sentence that Jim wrote:
> 2) In an alternate vision, Zope 2 evolves to Zope 5.
> Note that Zope 5 will leverage Zope 3 technologies to allow a
> variety of configurations, including a Zope 2-like configuration
> with implicit acquisition and through-the-web development, and a
> Zope 3-like configuration that looks a lot like the current Zope
> 3 application server. Maybe, there will be a configuration that
> allows Zope 2 and Zope 3 applications to be combined to a
> significant degree.
In this scenario I cannot see how much of the old ways of zope2 remain
(unless I have a totally unrealistic view of what Jim proposes). zope 2
or zop3 become an issue of configuring which "components"/parts to use.
But he also says:
- Zope 3 doesn't have to reproduce all Zope 2 features.
Which i fear could mean that the Zope 2 stack will hang in there for ever.
I am pretty shure that is not what he meant meant to imply, I just
wanted to make my view clear.
hilsen/regards Max M, Denmark
IT's Mad Science
Zope3-dev mailing list