Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
Max M said the following on 2006-02-27 17:26:

Jim Fulton wrote:

2) In an alternate vision, Zope 2 evolves to Zope 5.



Zope 2 is complicated! It has too many layers of everything.


read the full sentence that Jim wrote:

 > 2) In an alternate vision, Zope 2 evolves to Zope 5.
 >
...
 >
 >      Note that Zope 5 will leverage Zope 3 technologies to allow a
 >      variety of configurations, including a Zope 2-like configuration
 >      with implicit acquisition and through-the-web development, and a
 >      Zope 3-like configuration that looks a lot like the current Zope
 >      3 application server.  Maybe, there will be a configuration that
 >      allows Zope 2 and Zope 3 applications to be combined to a
 >      significant degree.

In this scenario I cannot see how much of the old ways of zope2 remain (unless I have a totally unrealistic view of what Jim proposes). zope 2 or zop3 become an issue of configuring which "components"/parts to use.


But he also says:

   - Zope 3 doesn't have to reproduce all Zope 2 features.

Which i fear could mean that the Zope 2 stack will hang in there for ever.

I am pretty shure that is not what he meant meant to imply, I just wanted to make my view clear.


--

hilsen/regards Max M, Denmark

http://www.mxm.dk/
IT's Mad Science

_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to