On 2/28/06, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I think the other major point is the "door #2" proposal takes pressure
> off of Zope3:  under that regime, Zope3 does not need to grow all the
> features present in Zope2, which door #1 *does* imply.

I still would like to know wich these missing features are. Unless
it's TTW development, which, as mentioned, I think should be viewed as
a separate set of packages. Most Zope3 developers do not want or need

Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo     http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Content Management     http://www.cps-project.org/
Zope3-dev mailing list
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to