On 3/1/06, Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem is that "Zope 3" is already very confusing.
That may be, but it doesnät help, because the name is Zope3. If you rename it, then you will only add to the confusion, becuase then there will be Zope2, Zope3 and Z, and everybody will be even more confused. Since the difference between Zope3 and Zope3 is becoming less with every release, we would then in the end have three different names for the same thing. Trust me, that won't help a bit. Jims proposal of Z(ed) was also for something different, namely the set of technologies that Zope 3 build on, as I understand it. That makes some sense, as Z + Object Publishing = Z Object Publishing Environment = Zope. But I'm not sure it will be helpful, and following this debate we can see that even that additional naming is confusing. So, stop flogging a dead horse. No renaming. Not now anyway. -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/ _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3firstname.lastname@example.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com