Stephan Richter wrote:
On Saturday 04 March 2006 21:26, Jim Fulton wrote:
Is a proposal for using ConfigParser, rather than ZConfig for high-level
I am +1. Anything that allows us to decrease our code base and use a standard
tool is good. We can always have a schema-verifying layer on top of
ConfigParser. Validating the fields is currently the biggest advantage of
And, now that you mention it, the schema system used by ZConfig is unique
to ZConfig. For historical reasons, it doesn't use zope.schema. It would be
fairly easy to provide a simple schema system for ConfigParser data based
on zope.schema for verification and conversion.
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
Zope3-dev mailing list