Florian Lindner wrote:
>>I think ovarall, Phillip should support those named layers.
That feedback is a little late. The proposal had been around for months!
By the way, from what I read in the old layer code (which seemed to be
yours), I got the impression that named layers and skins were slated for
deprecation but simply not officially deprecated yet.
> Yes, I have my interface registered with:
Note that this makes the interface a skin. Layers don't have to be
registered at all anymore.
> class ICentershockSkin(zope.app.rotterdam.Rotterdam):
> I've tried to use the name centershock in either a layer or a type attribute,
> but nothing worked.
You will have to state the layer using standard dotted names to access
the interface, e.g.: layer=".interfaces.ICentershockSkin".
> Only giving the the python path with the layer attribute
> worked. The type attribute does not even seem to exist, although I understood
> Philipps proposal that it should replace the layer.
> (tested with a resource directive)
Ooops, sorry, I forgot to properly update the Implementation Status.
Zope3-dev mailing list