Jim Fulton wrote: > > - Look at opprtunities for limited robust reload. Perhaps we could > define reloadable modules, especially for defining adapters, > with restrictions on their definitions and exports in a way > that allows robust reload. This would probably be based on the > persistent-module experiments. This is a fair bit of deep work > though and I'm not sure who has the interest and ability to make > it happen. > > I'm really not interested in a reload faclity, like the one commonly > used in Zope 2, that is not robust. I've wasted too many hours > helping people debug problems that were caused by reload misshaps.
out of curiosity, what are the things that make a reload not robust ? is it just a matter of dependencies or it's deeper ? Tarek _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list [email protected] Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
