Fred Drake wrote: > On 7/6/06, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> - Do other people also think it'd be a good idea to come up with some >> repository guidelines? Stephan had a proposal about specifying package >> metadata and code maturity/quality, I think it's worth working towards >> easily accessible info like that. If others agree, then let's get >> started. > > Whether Stephan's proposal is exactly the right thing, I don't know (I > didn't read it carefully), but something is clearly needed. At the > very least, a README.txt at the top-level of each project's trunk > seems reasonable (and yes, I know many of the zc.* packages don't have > that at the top level).
Right. I wasn't meaning to point fingers at anyone. We have no policy currently, after all, so it's understandable that things are underdocumented. I'll be happy to help out with that, though. I'll have to reread Stephan's proposal as well. Whether or not it's suitable, in part or in whole, will have to be decided indeed. I'm glad though that you agree something's needed. How do we get started with the corresponding foundation committee (assuming that's where the appropriate starting place is)? Philipp _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3firstname.lastname@example.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com