Jim Fulton wrote:
Perhaps the system shouldn't
allow such combinations (adapter security + security of the class)?

I agree. This combination should raise a ConflictError IMHO.

I don't agree. It is reasonable to me that different adapters derived from the same class
could need different permission settings.

Hmm. Ok. We probably need a rephrase of what Philipp and I both seem think: we need a mechanism that makes debugging this situation better. It took way too long to find out what was going on.

I don't have a good idea for the solution yet, but I think that this is the actual goal, for which the ConflictError is probably not suitable.


gocept gmbh & co. kg - forsterstra├če 29 - 06112 halle/saale - germany
www.gocept.com - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone +49 345 122 9889 7 -
fax +49 345 122 9889 1 - zope and plone consulting and development

Zope3-dev mailing list
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to