On Sep 12, 2006, at 10:33 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
- I think we want a release manager.
You're a genius! I'll just snap my fingers.
What happened after you snapped? :)
You became the release manager. Welcome aboard!
Does the application of irony indicate that we (I) should get over it
and ignore the problem (for now)?
No, only that talk is cheap. I apologize for the irony. This talk
of "just release whatever we have on date X no matter what shape
it's in and ignore all the other issues we have" puts me in a ornery
mode, the best side of which is irony.
Do we want to find a way how to go
without a release manager?
I don't like agreeing that there is an open
end and than just letting the discussion about it die somewhere. I
wanted to be explicit.
I'm happy to discuss solutions. I've mentioned some ideas. I just
can't accept a fixed release schedule that sacrifices quality.
- Make it easier (or make it better understood how) to make
+1 MakingARelease spells it out pretty clearly. There are a lot of
issues here that I don't want to bring into this thread.
New thread then?
Yeah, but not now.
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python
CTO (540) 361-1714
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
Zope3-dev mailing list