On Sep 25, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
It would *also* require that we
implement the "no side-effects during parsing" policy (my other
favorite
"dead horse" in arguments about ZCML's implementation / usage).
Beat away. :) I've been in favor of this for some time. This is
definitely a goal.
Can we have a papal edict that zcml that has side effects is a bug?
(including the dotted name thing...)
No, but I'm definitely in favor of refactoring existing handlers so
they do pretty much all of their work in the actions they generate.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python
Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714
http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
[email protected]
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
